"Bubble" is an emotive term used to grab the attention of the nervous investor. It conjures up memories of the 2008, 2001 or 1987 stockmarket crashes. But the term is too often used without explaining to the reader what a bubble in other markets such as bonds actually means
We look at the last 100 years to show the worst corrections in equities, bonds and property markets, and show a bubble correcting in equities is likely to cause 3 to 4 times more pain than one in bonds, with housing somewhere in between
When you hear that a “bubble” is about to burst in financial markets, how much of a loss does that make you think of? 5%? 10%? 30%? Problem is there is no definition, but it’s associated with painful experiences such as the technology stocks bubble in 2001 or the US housing market bubble that brought down the world in 2008.
And that’s the problem. “Bubble” has become a term used in financial media more and more to invoke thoughts of losses of the magnitude of those market collapses, for example 40-50%, but used in association with markets without the volatility to ever fall anywhere near that far such as bonds. Headlines sell, but there is no data in the articles to give the reader a sense of what a bubble actually means and what the losses from the bubble bursting might be.
If commentators imply that something terrible is about to happen, they should let people know the implications.
So here’s a translation guide to help next time you hear that term. Then you can have the more subjective debate about whether there is a bubble or not and understand why it matters.
What is a bubble?
Firstly, the term itself comes from the fact that when assets go up in value we say that they are “inflating”. Inflating asset prices are a good thing – that and income are the reasons we invest. If assets inflate beyond their fair value, that is they are over-inflated, and that continues for some time, we call that a bubble. What typically happens when a bubble bursts is that prices fall back to normal levels or even beyond. So any asset market can be in a bubble if it is over-inflated for an extended period of time, but the bursting of the bubble and fall back to normal levels results in very different loss scenarios for investors. Riskier markets tend to over-inflate much more than lower risk markets.
The problem with a bubble is that it’s hard to know you are in one until the crash comes. So the key is to know what the implications of the crash could look like and how you would cope if this occurred. The below table shows some historic data to provide relativities between the way different markets have fallen in the past. The obvious, yet seldom reported conclusion is that bonds don’t fall as hard as riskier asset classes like equities or housing. It’s obvious because they also don’t rise as much, they are simply less volatile.
Worst crashes in the last 100yrs
The worst correction in Bonds was one sixth of the size of the worst equities correction.
Source: Federal Reserve Economic Database; Dr Robert Shiller
Note: The last column details the expected return assuming the portfolio is equally split between all three asset classes and held for the years listed in the first column. We assume interest is compounded annually. In 2009 the portfolio is just held for the single year.
Worst years over the last 100 years
The worst year in bonds would not make it on to the worst 10 equities years, and the average of the worst ten years for equities is more than a massive 4 times worse than that for bonds. Bonds are lower risk and show lower volatility.
Source: Federal Reserve Economic Database; Dr Robert Shiller
Worst months over the last 35 years (using Corporate Bonds and Equities* this time)
Even the “infamous” bond crash of 1994 resulted in losses that would have ranked outside the worst 50 months if compared to equities. Corporate bonds are higher than risk than government bonds, but the worst equities months are still 3 times worse than the worst corporate bond months.
Source: Federal Reserve Economic Database
*Using Corporate Bonds is more relevant than Government Bonds used in the first two tables, but there is not reliable data going back further than 1979.
The contents of this document are copyright. Other than under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of it may be reproduced or distributed to a third party without FIIG’s prior written permission other than to the recipient’s accountants, tax advisors and lawyers for the purpose of the recipient obtaining advice prior to making any investment decision. FIIG asserts all of its intellectual property rights in relation to this document and reserves its rights to prosecute for breaches of those rights.
Certain statements contained in the information may be statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements. These statements involve subjective judgement and analysis and may be based on third party sources and are subject to significant known and unknown uncertainties, risks and contingencies outside the control of the company which may cause actual results to vary materially from those expressed or implied by these forward looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in the information regarding past trends or activities should not be taken as a representation that such trends or activities will continue in the future. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Opinions expressed are present opinions only and are subject to change without further notice.
No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. There is no obligation to update, modify or amend the information or to otherwise notify the recipient if information, opinion, projection, forward-looking statement, forecast or estimate set forth herein, changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate.
FIIG shall not have any liability, contingent or otherwise, to any user of the information or to third parties, or any responsibility whatsoever, for the correctness, quality, accuracy, timeliness, pricing, reliability, performance or completeness of the information. In no event will FIIG be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages which may be incurred or experienced on account of the user using information even if it has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
FIIG provides general financial product advice only. As a result, this document, and any information or advice, has been provided by FIIG without taking account of your objectives, financial situation and needs. Because of this, you should, before acting on any advice from FIIG, consider the appropriateness of the advice, having regard to your objectives, financial situation and needs. If this document, or any advice, relates to the acquisition, or possible acquisition, of a particular financial product, you should obtain a product disclosure statement relating to the product and consider the statement before making any decision about whether to acquire the product. Neither FIIG, nor any of its directors, authorised representatives, employees, or agents, makes any representation or warranty as to the reliability, accuracy, or completeness, of this document or any advice. Nor do they accept any liability or responsibility arising in any way (including negligence) for errors in, or omissions from, this document or advice. Any reference to credit ratings of companies, entities or financial products must only be relied upon by a ‘wholesale client’ as that term is defined in section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). FIIG strongly recommends that you seek independent accounting, financial, taxation, and legal advice, tailored to your specific objectives, financial situation or needs, prior to making any investment decision. FIIG does not provide tax advice and is not a registered tax agent or tax (financial) advisor, nor are any of FIIG’s staff or authorised representatives. FIIG does not make a market in the securities or products that may be referred to in this document. A copy of FIIG’s current Financial Services Guide is available at www.fiig.com.au/fsg.
An investment in notes or corporate bonds should not be compared to a bank deposit. Notes and corporate bonds have a greater risk of loss of some or all of an investor’s capital when compared to bank deposits. Past performance of any product described on any communication from FIIG is not a reliable indication of future performance. Forecasts contained in this document are predictive in character and based on assumptions such as a 2.5% p.a. assumed rate of inflation, foreign exchange rates or forward interest rate curves generally available at the time and no reliance should be placed on the accuracy of any forecast information. The actual results may differ substantially from the forecasts and are subject to change without further notice. FIIG is not licensed to provide foreign exchange hedging or deal in foreign exchange contracts services. The information in this document is strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of the information contained in this document, you may not disclose or use the information in any way. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this document. FIIG is the owner of the copyright material in this document unless otherwise specified.
The FIIG research analyst certifies that any views expressed in this document accurately reflect their views about the companies and financial products referred to in this document and that their remuneration is not directly or indirectly related to the views of the research analyst. This document is not available for distribution outside Australia and New Zealand and may not be passed on to any third party without the prior written consent of FIIG. FIIG, its directors and employees and related parties may have an interest in the company and any securities issued by the company and earn fees or revenue in relation to dealing in those securities.